Katherine Isbister is Professor of Computational Media at the University of California, Santa Cruz, and is the author of Better Game Characters by Design. She was the founding Director of the Game Innovation Lab at New York University.
Katherine Isbister is Professor of Computational Media at the University of California, Santa Cruz, and is the author of Better Game Characters by Design. She was the founding Director of the Game Innovation Lab at New York University.
Your book How Games Move Us talks about the techniques used in gaming to encourage players to put themselves in the place of another person, or even that of an animal, or an alien.
I don’t think there’s yet been a very sophisticated cultural conversation about how games actually do this for people. I believe this is because people don’t have a literacy for unpacking the decisions that the designers made and how these create particular responses. It is similar to thinking about film literacy, you know: What techniques do directors use to shape our feelings? How is a Tarantino movie different than a James Bond movie, or different to an arthouse film.
So that was my driving motivation for the book. I’ve been working in this field for a long time, and there are some very interesting and subtle and powerful techniques that game designers have come up with that shape how we feel.
I wonder if, briefly, you might be able to run through some of the top level techniques.
Sure. The first thing that people need to understand is that games are very different from other media, in that they offer the player active choice. Basically, that instantly allows for different feelings – it is harder to feel guilt, for example, when you are watching a movie, because you haven’t taken any actions, you are watching others take actions.
Avatars – characters that you inhabit in the game as a player – are a really interesting innovation. You are given this vessel, you’re given this body, and you feel things in the game through that. If you are in a snowboarding game for example, you hear the sound and you get the vibration from the controller, and you are given a set of choices that match what that body is capable of doing. Suddenly, you can do crazy tricks on your snowboard because you are in this body, and you map yourself to it. You get to feel that kind of powerfulness.
“The developer wanted to evoke that sense of awe, and wonder, and smallness of the people who first landed on the moon.”
Then, because games have human representation in them, they also evoke social feelings in us. So if there’s a non-player character in the game that behaves in a certain way towards me, I can’t help responding to it in a social way. They are carefully crafted by the designer to get you into a particular emotional state and drive you to make choices that will be interesting, steering things for you. If I spend a lot of time with a character, and then that character sacrifices itself for me, I am sad. I feel a sense of loss, even though I know it is just zeroes and ones somewhere in a machine. It all happens moment by moment in real time. That is super powerful.
The last thing is, unlike typical desktop software, which these days it’s designed so that you can take any action at any time – the computer doesn’t know what you did before and what you are going to do next, for the most part. Games are designed so that the developer does know. So that allows the game designer to control the social and emotional context for your situation, and there’s a lot of very artful crafting of scene-setting that goes on in games, that also very powerfully contribute to how a person feels.
I wonder if you might pick out a recent game that you think effectively achieves this.
The game on the cover of my book is called Journey: that was a game that came out for the PlayStation from a small game development company, and just had a really different feel to it. The developer has talked about the people who first landed on the moon and how they felt this sense of awe and wonder and smallness, and how he really wanted to evoke that in players. This is unusual: many games want to to feel powerful and in control of everything, like a superhero. Which is also a great and fun way to feel. But Journey is noteworthy for going in a different direction.
So, if you look at the avatars, they are tiny in relation to the game world, they are very simply rendered, there is not a lot of customisation choice. You get this character, and you are thrown into this enormous landscape.
“You don’t care who the each other is, it doesn’t matter. You don’t have to discuss the niceties, or what sweater you have on.”
It was a game in which you could encounter somebody else anonymously online and play together; typically when that happens all kinds of unsavoury things can happen to you, but they created this very elegant, pared-down interaction between players. What happens here is that you encounter another person who looks very similar to yourself. The only way you can communicate is by making these little chirping noises, and moving your avatar around to convey your intentions. This just strips away the potential for having a lot of heavy discourse and it really focuses the engagement on situations right at hand.
And because the world is large, and overwhelming, and you are both small, you find that you want to work together. You feel a sense of transcendence and camaraderie, the sort of moment that you may sometimes have with strangers. Let’s say: there’s a snowstorm and you just go together spontaneously and you help push somebody’s car out of the snow. You don’t care who each other is, it doesn’t matter. You don’t have to discuss the niceties, or what sweater you have on. It is about feeling that together you did something you couldn’t have done alone, in a very basic human way.
I’ve played other role-playing-games, like World of Warcraft, where you come across other people. But, perhaps because there are so many players, it can feel like a much more empty experience. Other people run around, or attack you, or send you all sorts of strange messages. I found it quite intimidating.
A lot of massively-multiplayer online games [MMOs] suffer from this problem of numbers. Any given person coming into the experience is going to find it is hard to find that nice experience you want in the context of this wild and woolly world. The best MMO designers spend a lot of time thinking about how to craft coming into that experience, and finding your place, finding your way.
What a lot of the best games do is that they very elegantly constrain the capacities for interaction. Another one I mention in the book is Little Big Planet, which is interesting because it is a game that kids and grown ups got really engaged with, and also had a very simplified palette of interaction. In this case, they created this pantomime capacity with the joysticks on the controller, and so people could play out slapstick style comedy with each other. And that automatically sets a certain tone.
“People could play out slapstick style comedy with each other. And that automatically sets a certain tone.”
It is a platformer-style game where you have to solve puzzles together. There are typically a lot of moments of frustration in a puzzle game. So being able to be slapstick and engage in physical humour with each other’s characters is a way of letting off steam and bonding over this shared experience.
Let’s move on to your book choices. The first isThe Art of Game Design: A Book of Lenses. Why did you choose it?
This book is written by a respected game design practitioner and academic, and it is one of the classics. It is one of the books that many game design education programmes would have students read. It is also very accessible, so I think it is a great way for someone who is curious about game design to learn about the different components involved. What Schell means by a books of lenses is that he doesn’t offer a single approach, he offers a lot of different perspectives to thinking about how to engage with design.
“If I am choosing books that will cut to the chase, and get them running on the subject very quickly, this book is one of them.”
For example, there are several sections devoted to game mechanics, as well as sections devoted to story, game worlds, and characters. Each has practical information gleaned from Schell’s experience as an educator and game developer. Jesse Schell has a well regarded game company, and he is a professor at Carnegie Mellon University in the ETC [Entertainment Technology Centre] programme, so he is sitting in both of those worlds. If I am choosing books that will give someone a head start, that will just cut to the chase and get them running on the subject very quickly, this book is one of them.
Do you design your own games?
Yes, I work with teams of students. In the last few years, we’ve done a lot of co-located multiplayer games: games that use sensors that track where and how you move to create fun dynamics. I play a producer-designer role, but it takes a team of people to put these kinds of games together – technical skills, artists and such.
If you were to create a reasonably simple video game, would this take months or years? What sort of timeframe are we talking?
No, the thing is now we have these tools like Unity, for example, one of the most broadly used tools for game generation. It is free, or at least the student version is free, and you can create a simple game in a day if you want. If you want to make, let’s say, a very simple, html-5 based mobile game, it might take a team of three people three months. You can craft an interesting experimental game in that sort of time. It’s a matter of the scope of your idea and the platform you are trying to build it for, and then how polished you want it to be. If you want it to make it through the app-store, it is going to take more people and more time.
I love the idea of experimental games. Might you direct me to some interesting examples?
Are you familiar with Steam? Well, in the last few years, aggregator websites have arisen that allow you to purchase and download all sorts of games. Steam is the most well known example, and the games there range from the mainstream to the experimental. But Itch.io is a place to go for really quirky, experimental content. You can find all kinds of things there. Another thing that I would recommend is to check out the winners every year of the IGF [International Games Festival] awards. For example, have you played Papers Please? That was one of the IGF winners in a couple of different categories. In brief, you are a customs official in a made-up country, and you are given these rules for who to let through and who not, and from this simple premise develop some interesting moral conundrums and decision points. That’s a good example.
Your second book isWhat Video Games Have to Teach Us about Learning and Literacy.
This book, you could argue, is the book that launched – at least in the US – the tremendous interest in games for learning. Gee was a professor who had nothing to do with video games, who just dove into the subject and ended up realising what an incredible potential resource they were for learning.
“He ended up realising what an incredible potential resource they were for learning.”
In this book, he takes what I would say is a sort of ethnographic style approach, where he is trying to understand games as a participant observer, and then extracting these learning principles for games. He translates for the reader what he sees as specific learning techniques that are embedded in different styles of games. I think it was a really valuable account for educators who otherwise maybe didn’t play. I mean, at some level, we have a bit of a generational issue with video games, that people who are older maybe they played early arcade games, but they didn’t necessarily grow up playing complex games, and so they have all kinds of preconceived notions. I think that James Gee did a really good job in this book of unpacking games for educators and parents.
One example is that he points out how games offer ‘psychosocial moratorium’, basically that gamers can take risks in a space where real world consequences are lowered.
Do you mean taking risks in war games and Lara Croft, that kind of thing?
What it means is that one reason games can help with learning is that game play happens in a magic circle, a play space outside real-world consequence, so you can take a risk in a game and you know you can just go back and replay. In typical learning situations, you take a test and there are stakes, you are being graded, right? Or you are in a classroom situation, someone asks you a question, and then suddenly the social stakes are high, if you answer correctly or not. Whereas if a kid is playing a game, you know, they have this feeling [of safety]. I guess you have to be careful about putting metrics into these educational games, because then they will start to have real world stakes too.
But his point being it actually encourages a sense of risk taking and experimentation for kids because they learn, ‘Oh, it is not so bad. My character died in this level, but I’ll just play it again, and I’ll learn from it. I’ll take a different strategy.’
And that is what exactly you need when you are trying to teach someone a new skill. You don’t want them to be crushed by failure.
Absolutely. Sometimes I come across students at the university level who are afraid to run forward and take risks. They are waiting for the metrics to be handed to them so they know how they can succeed. So one of the points Gee starts to make, in contrast to the views people had early on about video games taking away motivation, is they are actually training a certain kind of risk taking and engagement that is valuable to you as an adult.
Moving on to the third book,Communities of Play: Emergent Cultures in Multiplayer Games and Virtual Worlds.
I really like this book because I think that Celia Pearce takes the perspective of players and shows how players think about which games they play and also how they move among different game worlds. One of the interesting things she is studying in this book is how in massively multiplayer online games, as you mentioned before, there are a huge number of people and sometimes very complex communities. So she traces this diaspora of people who got very attached to one particular game [Uru: Ages Beyond Myst] and when that game’s servers closed they went to different gaming and online world platforms trying to recreate the sense of community that they had in the original game.
“She’d heard so much about the game that actually getting to play it had this heavy meaning for her, like walking into an ancient city”
She got to know these people as they were mourning the loss of this particular game world, and watched them trying to recreate it in another environment. At one point, they get access to the source code for the game and they can kind of resurrect a version of the game. She gets to walk through it. It is funny. She describes how she’d heard so much about the game that actually getting to play it had this heavy meaning for her, like walking into an ancient city. I think this book would really help somebody who is trying to understand player culture and why it’s so compelling, to get a feel for that intersection of community and virtual place, and how those things fit together. Because those players really loved the folklore of that game, and they also liked the interactions that they had in that game, and they had particular identities they formed. It is sort of like, a high school reunion kind of thing. You try to recreate these particular settings and scenarios that were so resonant for you.
I’ve been reading a lot about this town in Australia, Yallourn, which was demolished in the 1970s to make way for a mine. Years later, residents of Yallourn built this virtual world where you can walk around the streets. These gamers are so invested in this virtual world, it mirrors real-life displaced peoples.
Yes, it’s like a communal memory palace, and it speaks for how profoundly place affects how we engage with each other. I guess that’s the thing that I think is really undervalued and not well understood when thinking about games, is how because they can create a powerful shared place, they can create community and history for people.
I hope they managed to find an alternative home.
They did. Definitely my takeaway from the book was that although it is a sad thing and a loss when these servers shutdown, there is this living organism: communities that travel from game to game.
Next:Raising the Stakes: E-Sports and the Professionalization of Computer Gaming.
This is T. L. Taylor’s. She is just a wonderful academic, a sociology-trained researcher of video game experience. She was early in looking closely at e-sports, and e-sport has now become this huge phenomenon in gaming. So I think this is a great book if you are puzzled by this idea of professionalised video gaming.
This book really unpacks it, because she doesn’t play competitively – she comes from the outside in and does a nice job of showing the world of e-sports, how it is evolving, how the players are becoming professionalised. Sports networks are starting to show tournaments now. And I don’t know about the UK, but here in the US they are even starting to have collegiate leagues… Who knows? Maybe video game scholarships will soon follow.
One interesting takeaway from the book is how much players customise hardware for play; often they have special mic, special keyboard, special track-pad even, to give them a little bit of a physical edge.
A lot like, say, professional cyclists having a carbon fibre bike and aerodynamic helmets and so on.
Yes. And, you know, you normally think of gaming and think that they are just sitting there – it is not physical at all. But in fact there is a lot of performance aspect to this sport.
Although e-sports are becoming more mainstream, it is not new to have this high level competition. I’m thinking of that famous documentary The King of Kong . What do you think has changed since the days of King of Kong?
Well, I think the difference is that now games are being created for competitive play, to produce a very satisfying spectator experience. So if you think of, you know, a sport like basketball, sports were invented and then evolved in relationship to their audience, so I think that is one really interesting thing to think about is how the game designer is shaped by the need to cultivate expertise and spectacle.
I suppose maybe an equivalent in real-world sport, perhaps being something like 20-20 cricket where they cut down the length of play so as to make it more obviously appealing – so that it wouldn’t take up 5 days at a time, that sort of thing.
Exactly. There is this hilarious game Rocket League, essentially car soccer… You can find YouTube videos of people playing this at a very high skill level and it is just this rapid fire, round-based, competitive game, and it is a kind of thing you sort of can’t imagine evolving without an audience. It is so clearly about this goofy, over the top spectacle. That is another thing you may not realise when you first think about game design, is that it differs so much when you are thinking about spectating to when you are thinking about people playing alone.
It is amazing the way that these games get lodged in your motor memory. I played Sonic the Hedgehog with my nephews when it was re-released a few years ago, and it was as though I’d never stopped. I remembered everything, where to jump, where the secret passages were… I haven’t played it in ten, fifteen years. It is like learning to play a musical instrument, it sticks with you.
It stays in your brain and in your hands. And I think too there is something beautiful about expressing yourself through performance in that physical way and games because they augment and heighten your capacities. It is basically like you are a bionic version of yourself, then it heightens that crazy spectacle. Like if you are in Tony Hawk, and doing these crazy skateboard’s routines, it allows you to do a performance that is an exaggeration of yourself that is really satisfying to you and to others
Your final book is a novel: Ready Player One.
Ready Player One draws heavily on eighties video games – it is a mashup of eighties arcade-style games, and this very immersive VR-enabled, massively-multiplayer world that’s imagined in the future. I think a lot of people have access to them [the eighties games] as cultural tropes, so that’s just really fun.
“What are the potential social implications of gaming extending further into our lives, and how will it affect our relationships to others?”
It taking these current trends around the rise of VR and people’s fascination with that, also cultural forces like income, inquality and other disparities… it takes those things to the extreme and crafts this fantasy world in which you get really good at this game, you have the potential to succeed. It tracks a particular character who is an underdog-type figure, really good at the game despite all odds who ends up meeting one of the creators of the game. It is sort of a classic feelgood adventure story. I actually think it is a pretty lighthearted book in that way. There’s going to be a movie version in the next year or so – Spielberg is signed up to direct it.
It centres around a search for an Easter Egg – whoever finds the Easter Egg receives a fortune and becomes the new leader. So it is almost like an old-fashioned search for the holy grail, but set in the future.
Exactly. What I really like about it, or the reason why I think it is good for this list is that it melds this eighties gaming culture with current gaming culture tropes. I think that gives an interesting access point for readers from both generations to think: What are the potential social implications of gaming extending further into our lives, and how will it affect our relationships to our bodies and our relationships to others? Will it give us access we didn’t have before to people? Will it cut us off from ourselves in certain ways? It is really grappling with a lot of these questions.
And it’s an enjoyable read as well?
Yes, it is very fun.
You’ve finished the book on Emotion by Design, but does this remain your main area of interest?
Yes, I’m definitely continuing to do research on this area, so I can tell you about one project that we are working on now. We have a project called All the Fields, and we are basically developing… Are you familiar with Twitch, the streaming video game platform?
I’m afraid not.
Oh, you really should check this out. Twitch allows you to very easily put a stream online of yourself playing a video game live. Just like you see my picture [on Skype], you can put your picture on screen and can be giving a blow by blow as you play – people love watching these streams. If you sign on to a stream, you can chat with the other people watching the stream and comment on what’s going on. So these days, when you are trying to decide whether to buy a video game, you might just go on to Twitch and watch someone streaming it, see what it is really like, see what they have to say about the game.
Anyway, what we are doing is that we are taking biosensors, and we are building a plugin for use with Twitch that allows you to see the players bio-signals. So we’ve got a Microsoft Band that reads heart rate and skin response, and we are also using software that labels facial expressions from the webcam. If a player who is streaming user our plug-in, everyone can see how their heart rate is changing, how much they are sweating, and how the software would label their expressions in real time.
I can imagine that would be extremely interesting for game designers – to see how levels of adrenaline spike during the game, that sort of thing.
Well, the interesting thing is that there have been waves of doing this behind the scenes for game developers and all sort of researchers in academia for a while, but there hasn’t yet been a release of those tools for players and spectators. We want to spark those conversations.
Interview by Cal Flyn
June 22, 2016
Support Five Books
Five Books depends on donations to keep going. If you've enjoyed this interview, please consider giving a gift.